Legal Opinion

Helmer v. Parsons

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1912No. Civ. No. 1082PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Chas. Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note in the sum of $3,500.

It appears from the findings that on December 4, 1908, defendant Parsons executed and delivered to one L. E. Jones a note and mortgage which was made the subject of the action; that upon delivery thereof Jones paid to Parsons the sum of $1,000, agreeing orally to pay him $1,000 in ten days, and the balance in thirty-five days; that on February 11, 1909, Jones paid to Parsons an additional $250, making in all $1,250, and no more, received by Parsons in consideration of the note and mortgage;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Murphy v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. St. Louis Natl. Bank v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Trinity County Bank v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Briggs v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kohn v. Sacramento Electric, Gas Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wilson v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Johnson v. RisdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API