Pitman v. Walker
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. D. A. Cashin, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action to recover five thousand dollars on a promissory note.
The note was executed by the defendant to the Boden Automatic Hammer Company, a corporation, in consideration for the purchase price of certain shares of the capital stock of the corporation, and was assigned to the plaintiff before maturity and for a valuable consideration. While the note was negotiable in form, it was assigned to plaintiff with security from the maker given after the execution of the note, but prior to the assignment, and consisting of an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- King v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Central Savings Bank v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.