Johnson v. Risdon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff’s action was in ejectment, seeking also damages for the retention of the premises. Defendants answered and also filed their cross-complaint. In this cross-complaint it was alleged that the husband of plaintiff, one Alvah M. Johnson, had by a series of fraudulent acts induced defendants to purchase the property involved in the present action along with other properties not affected by this particular litigation. The cross-complaint, among other things, alleged that the property involved here was acquired by plaintiff as the result of a sale under a trust deed;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Helmer v. ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. MargulisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960