Legal Opinion

Woodring v. City of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1947No. 34,613PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in a personal injury action. Originally the appeal was erroneously taken from the order denying defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante, a nonappealable order (Jaffa v. Libman, 152 Minn. 553, 189 N. W. 408), but, upon stipulation of the parties, judgment was subsequently entered and the appeal perfected therefrom. Thereupon the case was sub mitted' to this court for determination upon the record and briefs filed in connection with the original appeal.

On the afternoon of December 15, 1948, plaintiff, an elderly woman and a resident…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Nichols v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. McClain v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Roberts v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pettinger v. Village of WinnebagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Doyle v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Larson v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Teske v. Steele CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Hall v. City of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API