Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Village of Buhl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 24, 1924No. 24,193PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by a fall upon an icy sidewalk in the village of Buhl. It is based upon negligence. Plaintiff was given a verdict for $5,000. The village has appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

At right angles to one of the paved streets in the village is an alley across which there is a concrete walk. At the side of the alley is the usual curb and gutter. The village has covered this gutter, in the line of the walk, by iron covers or aprons each of which is about 20…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Nichols v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Smith v. City of CloquetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Genereau v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Rasmusen v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. McDonough v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. McClain v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Kelleher v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API