Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Anoka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1961No. 38,234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall on a public sidewalk. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

On December 6, 1955, at approximately 4:30 p. m., the plaintiff Hazel Hall fell on the sidewalk in front of the Herald building in Anoka. She claims that the fall was occasioned by ridges and bumps in snow and ice which the defendant city had allowed to accumulate and compact on the sidewalk. On the first trial of this case, the court directed a verdict…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. HolfeltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Klaman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Campion v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Slindee v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Mathieson v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Jackson v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API