Nichols v. Village of Buhl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C. J;
These two actions, by husband and wife, one by the wife for personal injuries received as a result of a fall on one of the sidewalks *496in defendant village, alleged to have been in a defective condition; the other by the husband for loss of the services of the wife during the period of her disability, were tried together, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff in each. Judgment was rendered accordingly and defendant appealed.
The facts are not in substantial dispute; at least the evidence is ample to sustain the allegations of the complaint as to the cause of the injury complained of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reedy v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Wright v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- City of Muncie v. HeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Graalum v. Radisson Ramp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- McDonough v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Roberts v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.