Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Village of Buhl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1922No. Nos. 22,941, 22,942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, C. J;

These two actions, by husband and wife, one by the wife for personal injuries received as a result of a fall on one of the sidewalks *496in defendant village, alleged to have been in a defective condition; the other by the husband for loss of the services of the wife during the period of her disability, were tried together, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff in each. Judgment was rendered accordingly and defendant appealed.

The facts are not in substantial dispute; at least the evidence is ample to sustain the allegations of the complaint as to the cause of the injury complained of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reedy v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Wright v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. City of Muncie v. HeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Graalum v. Radisson Ramp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. McDonough v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Roberts v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API