Pettinger v. Village of Winnebago
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action was one to recover damages sustained by the plaintiffs through the flooding of their basement alleged to have been brought about by the negligent construction and maintenance of defendant’s sanitary sewer system.
A verdict having been returned for the plaintiffs, which has the approval of the trial court, we necessarily state the facts as the jury would be justified in finding them in support of the verdict. Many of the facts are not in dispute. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Tate v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Taylor v. City of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Power v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Roche v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Georges v. TudorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Lore v. Town of DouglasWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
- Wilson v. RamacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Highview North Apartments v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.