Legal Opinion
Berg v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 12, 2013No. CIV. 09-4179-KESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. move for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims (Docket 149) and also move to exclude the testimony of four of plaintiffs experts (Dockets 140, 143, 145, and 147). Defendant Luzenac America, Inc. joins in the motions (Dockets 151,153, 155, 156, and 157). For the following reasons, defendants’ motions to exclude are granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Berg was diagnosed with ovarian…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer CompaniesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
- Grummer v. Budget Truck Rental LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
- Jayne v. City of Sioux FallsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Robert Leaf, Debbie Carr, Scott Lewis v. Bear Country USA, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
- Sioux Steel Company v. KC EngineeringDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018