Legal Opinion

Jayne v. City of Sioux Falls

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 5, 2020No. 4:18-cv-04088Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION COURTNEY JAYNE, individually and as 4:18-CV-04088-KES personal representative of the estate of M.Z., Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY vs. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Defendant. Plaintiff, Courtney Jayne, moves to exclude the opinion and expert report of defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Kenneth Nemire, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Docket 24. Defendant, the City of Sioux Falls, opposes the motion. Docket 44. For the reasons that follow, the court denies the motion to exclude expert testimony.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API