Hill v. City of Oxnard
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, P. J., pro tem
The plaintiff is now and for more than forty-six years has been the owner of certain real estate in Ventura County. She had created on her land an avenue for her convenience and pleasure, and planted thereon as early as 1880 some fifty-five walnut trees of the variety known as black walnuts in parallel rows, the rows being some twenty feet apart. They have grown to be large trees, some of them thirty inches in diameter, and having been planted by her own hands in her younger days, she is, naturally, very much attached to them. About the year 1898, and prior to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Minot v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Miro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pedro v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- City of San Diego v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.