Legal Opinion
Manford v. Singh
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1919No. Civ. No. 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The facts are stated in ■ the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is on the judgment-roll and involves the construction of “An act providing for the payment of wages,” approved May 1, 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 1268), and the amendment thereof, approved April 28, 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 299). The question was carefully considered by this court in Moore v. Indian Spring Channel Gold Min. Co., 37 Cal. App. 370, [174 Pac. 378], and the legislation was upheld as within the constitutional authority of the law-making power. Therein many decisions are reviewed, and the reasons justifying such legislation are clearly stated. Our faith in the legal soundness of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leep v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Moore v. Indian Spring Channel Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Singh v. Southland Stone, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Davis v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.