Legal Opinion

Monty v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1975No. 43629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a nonjury trial in favor of the plaintiffs (respondents), Ralph and Karin Monty, in a suit for the amount of a real estate broker’s commission paid by them to defendants (petitioners) Lewis W. Shurtleff and Shurtleff, Inc. The trial court found for the Montys, who claimed that the defendants had negligently failed to inform them of restrictive covenants materially affecting the value of a parcel of land they received in a real estate transaction in which they employed the defendants. It held that defendants’ nondisclosure rendered them liable for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Investment Exchange Realty, Inc. v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Witt v. John Blomquist, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. James Wood General Trading Establishment v. CoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Tackett v. CroonquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Stack v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lindland v. United Business Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Veach v. Meyeres Real Estate, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API