Investment Exchange Realty, Inc. v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission for negotiation of a lease. The question presented is whether a broker has a duty to expressly disclose a dual agency in which the broker represented both the lessor and the lessee.
The facts are not disputed although there is a very real dispute as to the interpretation to be placed on the facts. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc. (appellant) is the owner of a shopping center in Renton. The Ralston Purina Company, a Missouri corporation (hereafter Ralston), is a large concern with numerous business operations. One of the Ralston enterprises…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sylvester v. ImhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Moon v. PhippsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Frisell v. NewmanWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Ramsey v. SedlarWashington Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meerdink v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Mallory v. WattIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Wesco Realty, Inc. v. DrewryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Lindland v. United Business Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.