Legal Opinion

Schaaf v. Highfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 61666-3PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

The present case arises out of the sale of a home with a leaky roof in Bremerton. Petitioner Schaaf alleges that an appraiser (Olson) hired by the Veterans Administration (VA) conducted a negligent appraisal of the home and did not reveal the leaky roof to him. The trial court held that a VA appraiser owes no duty to a prospective purchaser like Schaaf and granted summary judgment to Olson. This court granted direct review of the trial court’s order on summary judgment dismissing Schaaf s complaint. We hold that a real estate appraiser owes a duty of care to third parties like Schaaf. Because…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API