Schaaf v. Highfield
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
The present case arises out of the sale of a home with a leaky roof in Bremerton. Petitioner Schaaf alleges that an appraiser (Olson) hired by the Veterans Administration (VA) conducted a negligent appraisal of the home and did not reveal the leaky roof to him. The trial court held that a VA appraiser owes no duty to a prospective purchaser like Schaaf and granted summary judgment to Olson. This court granted direct review of the trial court’s order on summary judgment dismissing Schaaf s complaint. We hold that a real estate appraiser owes a duty of care to third parties like Schaaf. Because…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.