Legal Opinion

Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1968No. 39270PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

In this action appellants (plaintiffs), alleging the breach of an agent’s duty of loyalty and full disclosure, seek recovery of a real-estate commission paid to respondents (defendants) who, as real-estate agents, handled the sale of appellants’ home. Following trial, the superior court dismissed the claim upon the grounds that the alleged breach was immaterial. This appeal followed.

We reverse the action of the trial court.

The salient facts are these: Appellants, by virtue of a change of employment, moved from Olympia, Washington, to the state of Colorado in June, 1963. As a result, they…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Dutton v. . WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Tyler v. SanbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Perez v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wilkinson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API