Legal Opinion
Windsor Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Haren
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
This is an appeal by plaintiff in error (Windsor Hosiery Mills, Inc.,) from the action of the trial judge in sustaining a demurrer to their declaration alleging damages for breach of contract.
On 30 July 1962 Windsor Hosiery Company, a partnership entered into a contract with Ed Harén, d/b/a Eto-wah Heating Company whereby Harén was to make certain improvements to real estate owned by Windsor Hosiery Company.
On 15 August 1962 Windsor Hosiery Company, Inc. was chartered as a Tennessee corporation. On 28 August 1962 the partnership, Windsor Hosiery Company., conveyed to this corporation Windsor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foust v. CarneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Lucas v. Hamilton Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Builders' Duntile Co. v. W. E. Dunn Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Moore v. Dallas Post Card Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blackwood Coal Co. v. Deister Concentrator Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Windsor Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. HarenTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Hog Heaven Corp. v. Midland Farm Management Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
- Lupo v. SHARE OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009