Legal Opinion

Foust v. Carney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1959PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

Foust filed his suit in the Chancery Court of Montgomery County for breach of contract. The bill as filed was demurred to. After the demurrer was filed an amendment was made to the bill. The demurrer was overruled by the Chancellor and a discretionary appeal allowed. The appeal has been seasonably perfected, errors assigned and arguments heard. We now have the matter for disposition.

The bill alleged a verbal contract between the appellee, Foust, and the appellants, Carney, et al. The demurrer of the defendants is based on two grounds to wit: (1) that the bill shows on its face that the cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Shedd v. Gaylord Entertainment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Wilkins v. Third National Bank in NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Trew v. OgleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API