Legal Opinion

Windsor Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Haren

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CURIAM.

The question presented by this case, being novel, involving the construction of T.C.A. 30-524, this Court granted certiorari.

*481After argument, and consideration by the Court, the Court has concluded that T.C.A. 30-524 has been correctly construed and applied by the Court of Appeals, and that the defense of estoppel to rely on said Code Section is not well made.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals is adopted as the opinion of this Court, as follows:

“The question here presented is whether in a case where suit has been revived against a decedent estate within nine months after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alamo Development Corp. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Windsor Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. HarenTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wunderlich v. FortasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Estate of Minton v. Claim of MarkhamTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Berke v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Estate of Patten v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Denis N. Etheredge v. Estate of Doris EtheredgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API