Legal Opinion
Blackwood Coal Co. v. Deister Concentrator Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-5104PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Plaintiff initiated this action to recover damages allegedly caused by its detrimental reliance on a “performance guarantee” given by defendant Deister Concentrator Co. (“Deister”) to entice plaintiff’s corporate promoters to buy certain equipment manufactured and sold by defendant. Presently pending before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment or in the alternative for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I shall grant the motion for partial summary judgment in part.
Sometime prior to April 1980, Jeffrey Sammak,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Sidney P. Small and William Landesman, D/B/A Small & Landesman v. Seldows Stationery, Jack Belowitz, Irving Platt and Irwin KatzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ettinger v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Knop v. McMahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Leonard v. Wessel (In Re Jackson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Fishkin v. Susquehanna Partners, G.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Sulakshna, Inc. v. Transmedia Network (In Re Sulakshna, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.