Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foster v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1960No. 41,072PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This original proceeding in quo warranto commenced by the state, on the relation of the county attorney, seeks to test the validity of certain ordinances of the city of Kansas City by requiring the defendant city officials, Mitchum, Swarner, and Regan, in their official capacity, to show by what authority they assumed a portion of the Fairfax industrial district and made it part of the city when they enacted and published certain ordinances annexing such land.

Two previous original quo warranto proceedings of similar character have been before…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Miller v. Common School District No. 87Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Smith v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. City of Lenexa v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API