Legal Opinion

Toombs v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a compensation case tried below on undisputed facts. The court dismissed the employee’s petition and he appealed.

Petitioner was an employee of Nickey Bros., who seem to he lumber dealers in Memphis, and this suit was brought against their insurance company.

The stipulation of facts upon which the case was tried is as follows:

“It is hereto agreed by the parties that the following facts are stipulated and are to be considered, together with the Court’s written finding of facts, the Bill of Exceptions in the above styled cause, that the petitioner, Toombs, worked every Tuesday, Wednesday…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dreyfus & Co. v. MeadeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. In re BettsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Lipinski v. Sutton Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Carmichael v. J. C. Mahan Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Freeman Taylor, United States of America v. Homer L. DemossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. Sandlin v. GentryTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tinsman Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Lennon Company v. RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Free v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API