Dreyfus & Co. v. Meade
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Prentis, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellants complain of an award made by a majority of the Industrial Commission (Hon. C. G. Kiser, Commissioner, dissenting).
Meade was employed by Dreyfus & Company, as night watchman, at their store located at the southeast, corner of-Second and Broad streets, Richmond, Va., and his duty required him to be on the premises or immediately adjacent thereto. About 11:30 p. m., May 10, 1924, he was walking north across Broad street, at First street, a block away from the store, for the purpose of getting a cup of coffee at a restaurant about two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Common School District No. 1 v. District Court of Itasca CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Taylor v. Binswanger & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bradshaw v. AronovitchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Conner v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Richmond Memorial Hospital v. CraneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Park Oil Co., Inc. v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.