Legal Opinion

Dreyfus & Co. v. Meade

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 1925PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prentis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellants complain of an award made by a majority of the Industrial Commission (Hon. C. G. Kiser, Commissioner, dissenting).

Meade was employed by Dreyfus & Company, as night watchman, at their store located at the southeast, corner of-Second and Broad streets, Richmond, Va., and his duty required him to be on the premises or immediately adjacent thereto. About 11:30 p. m., May 10, 1924, he was walking north across Broad street, at First street, a block away from the store, for the purpose of getting a cup of coffee at a restaurant about two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Common School District No. 1 v. District Court of Itasca CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Taylor v. Binswanger & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. AronovitchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Conner v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Richmond Memorial Hospital v. CraneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Park Oil Co., Inc. v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API