Legal Opinion

Lipinski v. Sutton Sales Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922No. Docket No. 51PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.

Plaintiff’s husband, decedent, was in the employ of defendant Sutton Sales Company in the capacity of salesman. Defendant was in the automobile business in Saginaw selling both new and used cars. The various salesmen in defendant’s employ met at its place of business at 8 o’clock each morning and received lists or names of prospective customers upon whom they called during the day. They made sales anywhere in the city and in some instances outside. Thejr were free to take their lunch when and at such places as they desired. At the time of the accident defendant had a sale on used cars.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Clifton v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Thomas v. Certified Refrigeration, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Dent v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API