In re Betts
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified question of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Myrtle Betts and others. Certified question of law by the Industrial Board.
1Opinion of the Court
Hottel.
— The statement of facts certified by said board is as follows: “On the 6th day of October, 1916, and for many years prior thereto, Ebenezer Crompton was engaged in the tinning and furnace repair business in the city of Indianapolis * * #; that during all of said period he maintained a shop and place of business in Fort Wayne avenue in said city; that for the purpose of transporting his employes and material from his place of business to * * * where they worked, and * * * back to his place of business, the said Crompton maintained and furnished to his employes a wagon and horse; that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Holland-St. Louis Sugar Co. v. ShralukaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- United Paperboard Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- California C. I. Exch. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. DehnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Reisinger-Siehler Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Anchorage Roofing Co., Inc. v. GonzalesAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.