Legal Opinion
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 13, 2004No. Nos. 03-1189, 03-1248PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
After remand, the United States Court of International Trade affirmed the De*1341partment of Commerce’s (Commerce’s) countervailing duty rate on Usinor’s products. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 246 F.Supp.2d 1304 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (Allegheny II); Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 182 F.Supp.2d 1357 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2002) (Allegheny I). Because the Court of International Trade correctly determined that the same-person methodology for calculating a countervailing duty rate is not in accordance with law, this court affirms.
I
In the 1980s, France became the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Delverde, Srl and Delverde Usa, Inc. v. United States v. Borden, Inc., Hershey Foods Corp. And Gooch Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- In Re Dr. Matthias RathCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- GPX International Tire Corp v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.