Legal Opinion
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 8, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-19; Court 03-00919PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff (“Allegheny”) seeks this Court’s review of Commerce’s application of its latest methodology for determining when the privatization of a foreign firm extinguishes a subsidy that is the basis for a countervailing duty order. The case arises from the privatization of the Italian state-owned steel group ILVA. ILVA, during much of the 1980’s and early 1990’s, was subsidized by the Government of Italy (“GOI”) through major restructurings and bailouts. 1 After investigating the subsidies, but prior to ILVA’s privatization, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Sichuan Changhong Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- GPX International Tire Corp v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.