Legal Opinion

In Re Dr. Matthias Rath

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 24, 2005No. 04-1419, 04-1420, 75/753,445, 75/753,597PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Matthias Rath (“Rath”) appeals from the decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) affirming the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) refusal to register the marks “DR. RATH” and “RATH” (“the marks”) on the principal register. In re Rath, 2004 WL 161352, 2004 TTAB LEXIS 18 (Trademark Trial & App.Bd.Jan. 22, 2004); In re Rath, 2004 WL 161351, 2004 TTAB LEXIS 19 (Trademark Trial & App. Bd. Jan. 22, 2004). The decisions of the Board have been consolidated on appeal. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Rath is a German citizen who applied to register the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  3. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Aktieselskabet AF 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Habeeba's Dance of the Arts, Ltd. v. KnoblauchDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Itc Limited v. Punchgini, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API