Legal Opinion

County of LA v. City of LA

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1963No. Civ. No. 27083Published

1Opinion of the Court

219 Cal.App.2d 838 (1963)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 27083.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Four.

Sept. 6, 1963

Roger Arnerbergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and Weldon L. Weber, Assistant City Attorneys, and Spencer L. Halverson, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Robert C. Lynch, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BURKE, P. J.

Is the county or the city obligated to pay the cost of detention of prisoners committed to the Los Angeles…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fletcher v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Nash v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API