Legal Opinion
Donovan v. Crisostomo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1982No. 81-4305PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
In this case arising under the Fair Labor Standard Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1978), the Secretary of Labor sued the defendants/appellants Luis and Teresita Crisostomo, individually and doing business as L & T Builders (“employers”). The Secretary asked the court to enjoin the employers from violating the overtime and record-keeping provisions of the FLSA and to award back wages for overtime compensation due 24' L & T employees. The district court granted judgment in favor of the Secretary. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Luis Crisostomo and Teresita…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Heiar v. Crawford CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1458, 36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 112, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,614 Wesley N. Heiar, Kenneth I. Strauman, and Myrl E. Brown, Cross-Appellants v. Crawford County, Wisconsin, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Secretary of Labor v. A. Michael Desisto, the Desisto Schools, Inc., Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor v. A. Michael DesistoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. First Citizens Bank of Billings, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- John H. Harkins v. Riverboat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.