Legal Opinion
Meineke v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 13, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0623PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
¶ 1 George and Elizabeth Meineke (“appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of GAB Business Services, Inc. (“GAB”), Roger Grady, and Robert McMullin (collectively “defendants”). The primary issue in this ease is whether GAB, an independent adjusting firm hired by appellants’ insurer, Hartford/Twin City Insurance Company (“Twin City”), owed a duty to appellants in adjusting their fire loss, separate from the duty GAB owed its principal, Twin City. Because the scope of GAB’s agency relationship with Twin City is necessarily measured by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Dear v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Napier v. BertramArizona Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Charleston Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Hamill v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Akpan v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.