Legal Opinion

Napier v. Bertram

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1998No. CV-96-0619-PRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review in this case to examine a court of appeals opinion holding that a taxicab passenger who was injured in an accident caused by the negligence of an uninsured motorist could maintain an action against (1) the taxicab’s owner/lessor for failure to obtain statutorily mandated uninsured motorist coverage, and (2) the owner’s insurance agent for negligent failure to procure that insurance. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24. We view the facts in favor of the party against whom summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings were granted.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jones v. Hyatt Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Carstens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API