Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of case reported in 84 Neb. 607.
1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.
Our former opinion in this case affirming the judgment of the lower court is reported in 84 Neb. 607, to which reference is had for a statement of the facts. The delayed shipment act of the legislature of 1905, under which this suit was brought, is assailed by defendant as being unconstitutional. The act upon which the attack is made also appears in our former opinion. A motion for rehearing supported by a brief in behalf of defendant has been filed, and also a reply brief by the plaintiff, and upon due consideration a reargument was ordered by the court, which has been submitted by counsel…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Supervisors v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Harris v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Gherna v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.