Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Montgomery
Indiana Supreme Court
Erran the Gass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages suffered by him on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant resulting in a personal injury to the plaintiff. A demurrer to the complaint for want of sufficient facts, and a demurrer to the second paragraph of the answer, were overruled, and the issues joined were tried by a jury, resulting in a special verdict and judgment, over defendant’s motion for a new trial, for $3,000 damages.
The errors assigned call in question the rulings on demurrer, the refusal of a new trial, overruling motions for a venire…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.