Legal Opinion
Ajax v. Gregory
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1934No. 25077. En BancPublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Main, J. —
The plaintiff, a registered pharmacist and the operator of a drug- store in this state, brought this action as a citizen and taxpayer for the purpose of securing an injunction against the defendants prohibiting’ them from carrying- out the provisions of chapter 62, Laws of 1933, Ex. Ses., p. 173 (Rem. 1934 Sup., §7306-1 et seq.), for the alleged reason that the act was unconstitutional. To the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint and refused to plead further. Judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which he…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Southern Railway Co. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.