Legal Opinion

Mole v. Jutton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 2004No. 126, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The issue we decide in this case is what is the proper cause of action when, in the course of performing a surgical procedure, a surgeon exceeds the consent he or she was given. Maintaining that the tort of battery is the proper cause of action, the appellant, Tasha Molé, in addition to a negligence claim, included a count for battery in the complaint she filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County against the appellees, Dr. Jerrilyn Jutton, (“Dr. Jutton”), Dr. George E. Linhardt, and Dr. Jutton’s employer, Linhardt Surgical Associates, P.A. and, at the conclusion of the trial,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christian Lewis v. Sheila D. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. McQuitty v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Hackney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Christian Lewis v. Sheila D. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Doctor's Weight Loss Ctrs. v. BlackstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API