Hackney v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.
For many of us, the rapid advancement of technology has relegated the ordinary postal system-colloquially referred to as "snail mail"-to an option of last resort. For others, it is not entirely a thing of the past. The physical mail delivery system provides an important avenue of access to the courts for those who do not or cannot, for one reason or another, use electronic mail, electronic filing systems, or the Internet at large.
In this case, Thoyt Hackney, Petitioner here and unrepresented at the time of the events in question, testified that he delivered a petition for post-conviction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Haag v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.