Trogun v. Fruchtman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are raised on this appeal. They are:
1. Did the trial court properly nonsuit plaintiff-appellant?
2. Did the trial court err in not applying the doctrine of res ipsa?
3. Did the trial court err in holding:(a) That plaintiff-appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of assault based upon the defendant’s failure to adequately inform him of the potential side effects of the drug INH ?(b) That the doctrine of informed consent in Wisconsin does not arise from a fiduciary obligation on the part of the physician?
Nonsuit of plaintiff.
Appellant asserts that he established a prima…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Schuster v. AltenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.