People v. Hanz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Defendant was charged with burglarizing the homes of Wenston Groves (Count I) and Princella Haskins (Count II), and a prior narcotics offense. A jury found him guilty on both counts of first degree burglary, and the prior conviction to be true.
Error is asserted in the denial of defendant’s motion for continuance. On the last day of a three-day jury trial defendant, appearing in propria persona, made several consecutive motions for continuance. On the day before, having been directed to proceed with his defense, defendant made two requests—that the court subpoena two witnesses, and that he…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. NorthcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. DinkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.