Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1962No. Crim. 4041PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants Clarence James Ford and Ralph Harold Manchester were convicted by a jury upon two counts of petty theft with prior felony convictions. (Pen. Code, § 667.) They appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The case before us involves separate thefts of two bicycles at Dixon and Vacaville on the night of January 13, 1961.

A red bicycle belonging to one Carpenter was stolen from the front of his house in Dixon, California. Carpenter last saw it there at about 7 or 8 p. m. He then left for a nearby café. While he was sitting in the café from which…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. MacHelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. SieversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API