Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1935No. Crim. 2600PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

By two counts of an information the appellants, together with their brother Aubrey S. Taylor, were charged in separate counts with burglary and receiving stolen property. Upon the trial before a jury Aubrey S. Taylor was acquitted of the charge of burglary but found guilty of the charge of receiving stolen property, while appellants were each found guilty on.both counts. From the judgments entered the latter bring this appeal.

Appellants contend: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdicts; (2) that a lawful conviction cannot be sustained of both the crime…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. DevlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Metter v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API