Legal Opinion
People v. Sturgeon
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1935No. Docket No. 125, Calendar No. 38,287PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
Defendant was convicted of engaging in and operating a used automobile dealer business in the city of Pontiac without having a license therefor, in violation of an ordinance. The provisions of interest are:
“Sec. 3. * * * The application (for license) shall be immediately referred by the city clerk to the city manager who shall cause an investigation to be made of the fitness of the applicant as to character. The application shall then be transmitted with the recommendation of the city manager to the city commission and if, in the opinion of the city commission, the person making’ the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Hoyt Brothers, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Devereaux v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bitter v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Blumlo v. Hampton Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Lyon Sand & Gravel Co. v. Township of OaklandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Milford v. People's Community Hospital AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Colonial Townhouse Cooperative, Inc. v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.