Lyon Sand & Gravel Co. v. Township of Oakland
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
By written opinion, the trial court found defendant’s zoning ordinance and parts of its ordinance no. 10 invalid as applied to plaintiff’s land and judgment entered accordingly. The judgment also enjoined defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s proposed sand and gravel mining operation on the land. Defendant appeals.
This action was originally commenced March 10, 1966, by plaintiff’s predecessor in title following defendant’s denial of a petition to rezone the land in question to permit sand and gravel mining thereon. June 12, 1967, plaintiff acquired the rights of the predecessor and on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Blumlo v. Hampton Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. SturgeonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dettore v. Brighton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Silva v. Ada TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Jamens v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Jamens v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.