Legal Opinion

Hoyt Brothers, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 130, Calendar No. 36,809PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, is. engaged in Grand Rapids and other cities in selling its merchandise through employees who solicit orders by a house to house canvass. The sales agents are each provided with a so-called certificate of identification, which among other things recites:

“The Passaic Home & Orphanage receives 10 per cent, of the net profits made by Hoyt Brothers, Inc., on the merchandise as shown on their regular price list. * * * Hoyt’s representatives are not authorized to solicit or receive contributions. ’ ’

Plaintiff alleges in its bill of complaint that it and its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Harrigan & Reid Co. v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Village of Durand v. LoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Postal v. Village of Grosse PointeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Milford v. People's Community Hospital AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Westervelt v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Local 170, Transport Workers Union of America v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API