Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Crenshaw

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1888No. 2525PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. F. A. Williams. The opinion sets out the facts, and the charges given and refused so far as necessary to a full understanding of the case. No question was made on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the district court for five thousand and seventy dollars as damages for personal injuries against the appellant. The injuries were alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, and its managing employes, in furnishing plaintiff a defective baggage truck with which to remove baggage to and from the trains in his employ as porter.

The defendant pleaded general denial, contributory negligence, and that the fellow servants of plaintiff in their common employment, contributed proximately to the injury by their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CallbreathTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Texas M. R. Co. v. WhitmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. T. & P. R'y Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Texas Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Belton Oil Company v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Dillingham v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. International & Great Northern Railroad v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API