Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Bradford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1886No. Case No. 2038PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from Bed Biver. Tried below before the Hon. D. H. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The appellee was foreman in charge of a section of appellant’s railway, and had been working in that capae*733ity for about six years before he was injured; was forty-six years old, had been railroading the most of his life, and, from his own statement, understood that business.

He thus states the manner and cause of the injury for which he seeks to recover damages: “On March 5; 1884, the road master passed over my section (66), going west on defendant’s road and ordered me peremptorily to straighten the rail, and told me that if I did not have it straightened by the…

2Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FrenchTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MathisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Snipes v. Bomar Cotton Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API