Legal Opinion

T. & P. R'y Co. v. Scott

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. Gr. Hazel-wood.

1Opinion of the Court

Robertson, Associate Justice.

In a charge to the jury a long statement of the contents of the pleadings can serve no useful purpose. It rather confuses than enlightens the jury, increases the costs of litigation, and swells to endless proportions the record here and in the court below. In the single half page of the seven and one-half pages thus occupied in this record, the issues the jury were to pass upon could have been clearly and fully stated. In the statement of facts, the repeated statements of one witness cover thirty pages, all of whose material testimony could easily have been put…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells v. CoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Pilkinton v. Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Klaffke v. Bettendorf Axle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Minty v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CrenshawTexas Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API