Legal Opinion

Dillingham v. Harden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1894No. 190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee for damages for personal injury. The facts under the verdict were substantially as follows:

Appellant, Charles Dillingham, was on January 30, 1889, receiver of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, and as such had employed appellee as a laborer, and he was assisting in putting in a stone foundation for a railway water tank at Denison for appellant. An excavation had been made about four feet deep, and appellee that day, under the orders of appellant, was in the pit thus made to assist the mechanics in placing the stone. He had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CallbreathTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CrenshawTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API