Legal Opinion

Bond v. National Fire Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Tucker County. Action by W. C. Bond against the National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn. -Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

Plaintiff recovered judgment in an action on*a fire insurance policy covering a sawmill and lumber stacked on the millyard, and defendant has brought the case to this court, assigning numerous errors committed by the trial court. These alleged errors are comprehended in the three princi*107pal propositions on which defendant relies, viz.: (1) That W. E. Qrooks acted as agent for both plaintiff and defendant in writing the policy which was an inconsistent relation and gave defendant the right to avoid the policy; (2) that plaintiff violated the promissory warranty against procuring…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Todd v. German American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Quarrier v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Dibble v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Sterling Fire Insurance v. Comision Reguladora Del Mercado De HenequenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Jackson v. Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. George v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API