Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Grange Mutual Fire Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1929No. 6468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

This is an action by H. M. Jackson seeking recovery on a policy issued by the Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in th$ sum of $1,125.66, and this writ followed.

It appears from the agreed statement of facts upon which the ease was submitted to the trial court in lieu of a jury, that the defendant, a farmers’ mutual fire insurance company, on September 23, 1922, issued a $3,000.00 policy to the plaintiff, $2,000.00 of which applied to a barn and $1,000.00 to personal property contained therein; that a gross premium of $15.00…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shinn v. West Virginia InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bond v. National Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oates v. Continental Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rick Merechka v. Vigilant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Cook v. Farmers Mut. Fire Ass'n of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API